How Women Built the Law, Mothers as Intelectuals and the Conscious Rule
How Women Built the Law: By examining judicial milestones for women, Fred Strebeigh inspires questions about the legal pioneers themselves. by Alyssa Rosenberg
This book review reminded me of the importance of working within! As has been the case for women in science & engineering, women and law have had a hard go at it. While we see more female lawyers than ever, they remain outside law firm partnerships. As a result of women practicing law however
women now have the completely uncontested right to practice law, or to receive disability benefits when they take time off from work to give birth or recover from an abortion, or to go to work without wondering whether their employer will feel free to grope them at their desks, does not mean the struggle to win those rights was any less significant than the fight to win the right to an abortion. That reminder of Roe’s place in a pantheon is a bracing—and worrisome—reminder of the magnitude and number of challenges women faced—and still face— as they struggle for legal equality.
After reading this article I came across this one about Susan Sontag: Why Can’t Mothers be Intellectuals edited by her son.
What struck me most about it was the fact that we expect her to be talking about nappy duty in her diaries, but we never expect men to do so in their biographies. I also appreciated her candid - and it should be candid as it was from her own diary - feelings about her ambivalence toward motherhood. I liked the article, precisely because it highlighted how she does not meet our womanly expectations and how uncomfortable that makes us feel - or more precisely how comfortable it made me feel.
Whazzup with Saturday morning feeds! I should quit while I am ahead. The New York Times delivered this article that ties in with both of the above Obama Set to Undo ‘Conscience’ Rule for Health Workers. The Conscious Rule was
a last-minute Bush administration rule granting broad protections to health workers who refuse to take part in abortions or provide other health care that goes against their consciences.
Translated it means refusing access based on ‘religious beliefs or moral convictions’ to the day after pill at the drug store, refusing access to an abortion, refusing the sale of birth control, and refusing emergency contraception to rape victims and any other reproductive right services or products, including sterilization in federally funded medical institutions.
Via Polymeme, The American Prospect, and the New York Times most emailed list.
