Atlas of the Risk of Homelessness

May 26, 2009

The Pilot Atlas of the Risk of Homelessness developed at the Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre was launched today.  Once the launch aspects slow down I will write a bit more about it.  Until then here is the link to it. 

Here is the Carleton Media Release: Carleton University researchers launch groundbreaking project to determine the risk of homelessness

Canadian Newswire: Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences 2009: Carleton University researchers launch groundbreaking project to determine the risk of homelessness

Metro News Story: Homelessness in Ottawa getting worse: Carleton study (This story is not quite right, we answered questions about Ottawa but the Atlas was not at all about Ottawa, people have their angles and their mandates and how these bias the story telling).

Another Metro Story: Carleton duo launches atlas to ID risk of homelessness (This is a better story title, we know that anyone taking transit will be reading this today, so maybe a new idea for some).

Ottawa Sun: Sex, tech and teaching: Academic meeting at Carleton covers wide range of subjects, Well, you know you are in trouble when you are on a panel with someone talking about sexting, and someone else talking about the poor education system - and your topic is homelessness.  The sun did not let us down, the focus was Sexting and homelessness got buried and not even in the headline! 

honesty and integrity

May 24, 2009

I am so relieved when I meet people and even more so have the privildge of befriending people who live honestly and with integrity. I breathe a sigh of relief when I encouter these people.  I know the relationship will be bumpy, but I also know it will be worth the ride.  While I have not read it all, Erich Fromm’s Escape from freedom comes to mind.  I glean from it that freedom, the freedom to - positive freedom - is most difficult.  It is this freedom that I aspire to and hope for.  I waiver, my vision gets clouded, but it is the one I believe in.  I have some dear and wonderful friends who are free on those terms, and I love them dearly.  I count on them and know that they are honest and have integrity, that together we will figure things out.

Why are these characteristics, traits, ways of doing, so difficult and so rare? Why am I always so sad, when people I care for fail here?  Is it because my expectations are too high? Is it because the people who were supposed to have cared for me failed so deeply in these areas? Is it because the systems that did eventually take over, fared worse? Is it because, that living according to these basic principles, is so very hard? And few can live up to the task?  Is it because I have experienced such disappointment and much harm stemming from a lack of honesty and integrity? Is that what tempers my views when I meet people who lack these traits, what leads me to I consider and label them as weak and dangerous? Where I just give up on them.  Often I rationalize these characteristics systemically, politically, socially, economically and consider the outcomes (e.g., homelessness, sexism, tyranny of the masses. etc.).  Within that I see so many compromises and compromised. Perhaps that is why I loath risk aversion, because it leads to freedom from, negative freedom, freedom derived and created from conformity -  the norm, the kind of freedom that prevents taking that extra step, that hard one that leads to and is along the virtuous path.  Perhaps this is why I think Ottawa as of late exhibits collective risk adverseness, apathy and mediocrity, it is because freedom is so very difficult.  It is easier to default to what is known, comfortable, easy, accepted, unquestioned.  That is the society I live in.  One that fears questioning itself thus yielding to dishonesty, a lack of integrity and the inability to really do the right thing.  But, it is easy to think about these traits at a societal scale.  What about the interpersonal? Is it a lack of empathy and compassion for myself and others if I and they do not live according to these basics and I judge them and me so harshly? How often do people have to fail on these grounds before you loose trust in them? Once? Twice? How much context has to be taken into consideration before one decides? I know someone who is so rationally bound to these ideas, that he alienates himself from anyone who wavers from his standards.  He has alienated family, his own children, etc. because they are inconsistent.  A most difficult character as he believes himself to be a peace practitioner.  Of course it is so much easier to be an adherent of peace if one is alone! But what of me?  I embrace my inconsistencies, which can be considered a lack of integrity, yet, the inconsistencies reflect my core values.  They are also a reaction against absolutism.  Since absolutism is what yields fanaticism, orthodoxy, exclusion - freedom from. This fuzzy logic leads to a thick line between conceptual, emotional and act spaces.  That edge space that is full of diversity, where worlds meet, where biodiversity is at its greatest.  It is these edges and spaces I, we depend on, the exceptional lines, hidden, but thick and obvious when the scale changes, when fractalized. But all that thinking, rationalizing, reflection, does not make the hurt stemming from the experience and witnessing of a lack of honesty and integrity.  It does not make it hurt any less.  Why am I and others, afraid to tell the truth, and so afraid of the freedom to live according to the results of that? It would just be so much easier would it not?

All that to say, that I am feeling a little sad today, a feeling I normally avoid, but today I am going to reflect more about why a lack of integrity and honesty affects my core.  Especially when it comes from people I love, count on and expect to have the strength to live according to those basics.

Thanks Mark!

Mark wrote up the notes and his reflections of a session I gave on my favorite topic data access!

on Goofyness!

May 17, 2009

Yesterday I went to Change Camp Ottawa, a pretty fine event put on by some geeks and nerds!  A delightful Senator participated, as did 3 Ignatieff staffers, some Feds, some really engaged and interested City of Ottawa Officials, city councilor advisors, private sector geeks, academics and engaged community association organizers.  There was a ton of intelligent earnestness and some pretty smart and people coming together.  I was coaxed into giving a session that was really well attended (30+/- people) on data access where I learned that I am not a bad group moderator.  The session generated some excellent conversations with people who are interested in learning and working together. Overall, a pretty good day.

The beverage part of the evening was conducted with a fine small group of people.  My partner in crime was the ever so wonderful Mark Tovey whom I had not spent time with in a while and a few other really fun people.  One of the younger fellahs was feeling a little emasculated though, because, as I overheard him whisper, this mature woman, was drinking him under the table!  What can I say, this younger generation has not learned the art of teleological drinking as Michael calls it.

We wound up making it to the terrible bar the Camp recommended, moved to a real bar The Brig, followed by a mini Ottawa tour for the Torontonian and the French guest now residing in Quebec through the Chateau Laurier to see the Karsh Portraits, climbing into the War Memorial Statue where we pondered scale, war, the impetus for that statue and rested in the incredible detail.  At this point, it was time to find a late night fallafel at Shawarma City, and a lychee martini with China Doll wearing one of her best pink laame mini dresses at the Shanghai

Mark got me up to sing my first ever karaoke song (beijing york would have been proud!) Do the Time Warp Again!  Oh my! This is where I learned that I have to looooooosen up.  Mark on the other hand was smashing.  So, I vow to explore and embrace some goofyness! My friend and neighbour Helen is a pro at this! And watching myriad versions of the Zombie Jambori on youtube while nursing a bit of a post party daze brought that home (The Sexy Harry Belafonte version on the Muppet Show was the best!). Coaxing and advice most welcome.

Seven Jewish Children

May 12, 2009

Caryl Churchill’s Seven Jewish Children, only a few minutes, download the text and see the clip.

In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars!

I love it! Vauban is an upper middle class German suburb designed without cars!  The

5,500 residents [who live] within a rectangular square mile, may be the most advanced experiment in low-car suburban life. But its basic precepts are being adopted around the world in attempts to make suburbs more compact and more accessible to public transportation, with less space for parking. In this new approach, stores are placed a walk away, on a main street, rather than in malls along some distant highway…

Suburbs are responsible for 

emissions from an increasing number of private cars owned by the burgeoning middle class are choking cities. 

…the [US] Environmental Protection Agency is promoting “car reduced” communities, and legislators are starting to act, if cautiously. Many experts expect public transport serving suburbs to play a much larger role in a new six-year federal transportation bill to be approved this year, Mr. Goldberg said. In previous bills, 80 percent of appropriations have by law gone to highways and only 20 percent to other transport.

A community in the Oakland California is also developing a community that is less dependent on the car.

The Hayward Area Planning Association is developing a Vauban-like community called Quarry Village on the outskirts of Oakland, accessible without a car to the Bay Area Rapid Transit system and to the California State University’s campus in Hayward.

 in Britain

“Development comprising jobs, shopping, leisure and services should not be designed and located on the assumption that the car will represent the only realistic means of access for the vast majority of people,” said PPG 13, the British government’s revolutionary 2001 planning document. Dozens of shopping malls, fast-food restaurants and housing compounds have been refused planning permits based on the new British regulations.

Vauban’s Website

NyTimes Article: In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars

Note: The comments to this article are also quite good!  There is none of the dribble I have been reading in the Globe’s comments and comment authors include their real names. 

Particularist Genres on Universal Themes!

May 6, 2009

The Globe has an article bemoaning the lack of universal and uniting theme songs in reference to a concert in honour of Peter Seger’s 90th birthday. True enough, but then again, the nature of music preferences and diffusion technologies means there is less a monopoly on style and language and concurrently a decrease in diversity on the airwaves because of corporate ads.  Also, interesting to note the kids on the stage with Peter were the biggies and anglo. 

There is a ton of great protest music that appears under many guises, languages and genres!  As I was reading and posting a comment (that has not yet been posted!) I listened to Jean Leloup, Manu Chao, les Cowboys Fringrants, Ani Difranco, M.I.A., Michael Franti and Chumbawamba. I then went and looked up an earlier post featuring the Peace not War compilations. Such good stuff! Then I discovered Peace not War TV and the New Pollutants: Blast the World 2 Space Dance Against the War video.  Awesome!

I would say, the themes, tunes, rhythms, languages they are a chagin’ but not the spirit!  We just need to reclaim the spaces for them to get heard!

Open Letter About Science Funding in Canada

May 5, 2009

Researcher Forum has published open letters to the Prime Minister and Members of the Opposition regarding the dire status of science in this country!

The blog also has some very interesting food for thought on how we thinking about science is changing.

 

We are measured by how well we care for our most vulnerable

May 4, 2009

I saw the film about Nathaniel Anthony Ayers tonight and just read this story about him.  The film is not always pretty and many times I cringed.  I also witnessed dignity and incredible respect.  I saw south central LA street life from the safe view of a truck window driven by an illegal Mexican immigrant a few years back.  It was hard to explain to my friend whose English was limited why I was crying as we drove by entire families and people in wheel chairs living in the worst of urban decay. One of the world’s richest countries and cities! 


data, information, infrastructure epiphony!

May 3, 2009

Today’s Sunday morning was dedicated to getting up when i woke up, irrespective of the time, jasmine pearl tea, Espace Musique, peanut butter on pan negro rye bread, pillows and Terms of Use: Negotiating the Jungle of the Intellectual Commons.  Soon I will water my newly planted trees to to round off the morning!

Hemmungs Wirten took me on a historical journey among many other places, to the commons, gleaners, loppers, commoners, enclosure, labour and public. One of the many facts I gleaned from her work, was that there never was a free for all commons. The commons was always bound in the realm of private property and a host of customary use rights. And very elaborate customary rights existed regarding the use of land.  Lords allowed commoners to use the commons for their subsistence, having property also entailed propriety, the priviledge of property was connected with obligations to others.  Enclosure of the commons pushed aside customary rights of use, seperating users from their rights.

The changes from village to town, from town to city, and from city to metropolis are infrastructural leaps and bounds that do not happen overnight.  The momentum is irreversible, and when the struggle for the rural commons is more or less over, the battle scene relocates elsewhere.  In the city, it takes on a new identity.  Suddenly we get a public for whom the rights associated with the commons no longer have much to do with their survival.  Now working as wage laborers in the industrial economy, this new collective is in need of space, air, and the aesthetic dimension of open green parks in order to endure their day to day existence.  For that to be possible, others are endowed with the ability to speak for that public, act in their best interest by proxy, and work to guarantee that the urban commons survives for them in order to achieve that ultimate goal: public health. Unless provided with such an outlet, in no time the public can turn into a mob, a crowd and an amorphous mass.

We cannot even imagine a public on a rural commons.  In our imagination commoners are still peasants, whose gleaning, stooping, and use of the wastes of agricultural or modern society is both a social and collective act but also one that makes you think of poverty.  In France the right to glean was also known as the patrimony of the poor…A public is something else, because as members of it we assume that we are engaged, not in the small talk of apple picking, but in that informed conversation with others…Even more crucially, we see others and ourselves in particular settings that control and guide our behaviour.  While it has become commonplace to draw attention to the commons as an alternative space when critizing the expansion of intellectual property, one would be hard pressed to find anyone in that camp defining himself or herself as a commoner…the image of the commons is appealing, but the experience of the commoner is not. (p.153-154)

So what! Well commoners disapear as public appears.  And with public, we see a seperation of users from their rights, and few institutions that protect was is considered public, or the public domain.  Where does the public go when resources are overexploited in the public domain? What conventions protect the public domain? What standards protect it? Which working group overseas this? Of course those are supposed to be our governments.  But where exactly in government?  The Greenbelt and Gatineau Park are always threatened by development, especially roads.  You can use parks in Montreal, but some parks have use rights ensuring that the homeless do not set up camp.  A CivicAccess.ca user, wanted to digitize a map he found in the public library, produced by the City of Ottawa.  This map included the location of all the public parks in the City.  He wanted to add those parks in a Google Mashup and tag each park with the City’s proposed development for those spaces.  He was not allowed to create such a map and we were deprived of comprehensive information about our public space.  Where does he go to argue our case?

We know that our City has many advisory committees:

  1. Accessibility
  2. Arts, Heritage and Culture
  3. Business
  4. Environmental
  5. Equity and Diversity
  6. French Language Services
  7. Health and Social Services
  8. Local Architectural Conservation
  9. Ottawa Forests and Greenspace
  10. Parks and Recreation
  11. Pedestrian and Transit
  12. Poverty Issues
  13. Roads and Cycling
  14. Rural Issues Advisory Committee
  15. Seniors

And also Standing Committees:

  1. Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee
  2. Community and Protective Services Committee
  3. Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee
  4. Planning and Environment Committee
  5. Transit Committee 
  6. Transportation Committee

And these meet on a regular basis and are open to the public.

We also have a city council comprised of 23 city councilors.  If anyone has payed attention to Ottawa lately, you will know that we have a serious municipal geopolitical split between urban, suburban and rural wards!  The last vote on the sole source unsolicited redevelopment plan for Frank Clair Stadium and the Transit strike during the coldest months of the year are clear markers of those divisions and disjunctures.

Alas, there is no committee that oversees nor one councilor that addresses issues related to data, information, infrastructure, science and related technologies.  I also cannot seem to find a chief information officer.  Where would one go to discuss access to public data? To develop decision making principles regarding disclosure of public data? To discuss the development of technologies and services to enable access? Licensing? Fees? To assess what is the public domain? The sharing of socio-demographic-health-economic data within the city?  How do citizens participate in evidenced based decision making? The role of citizens and re-invigorating participatory democracy and so on…

I wonder if a Data, Information and Geospatial and Communication Infrastructure Advisory Committee should be developed. Do any of these exist anywhere else?  There is a senate Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology (INDU), but it does not really deal with what is public and issues related to data, albeit some of us would like it to.  It will be difficult to discuss public in a committee whose primary focus is industry! Would it be worth it. What of the provinces? Should CIOs be in IT departments? Who would sit on these?