Heidegger and nazi’sm
I did not know this about him. Some, in particular Emmanuel Faye, a French Philospher, want to wipe his work out of philosophy.
First published in France in 2005, the book, “Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism Into Philosophy,” calls on philosophy professors to treat Heidegger’s writings like hate speech.
Richard Wollin, a close reader of Heidegger and Faye says:
“I’m not by any means dismissing any of these fields because of Heidegger’s influence,” he wrote in an e-mail message referring to postmodernism’s influence across the academy. “I’m merely saying that we should know more about the ideological residues and connotations of a thinker like Heidegger before we accept his discourse ready-made or naïvely.”
I had no clue and was naively reading his work. Not knowing his roots is like reifying Robert Moses without taking into account his deep racism and how that influenced his infrastructure building in New York, or glorifying Athenian democracy by forgetting that slave ownership was rampant, only wealthy men could participate and women were non persons and treated worse in Athens than in other Greek cities at the time. To claim that technology is socially or politically neutral?
How to read? How to think about technology, infrastructure, works? Most of what I have been exposed to in academia was written by white men of power, most of our technology and infrastructure was built by the same batch, many amazing artists are creeps like Woody Allen, Michael Jackson or Roman Polanski. Do we dismiss their art, thinking, artefacts? I have refused to see a Woody Allen movies since he got away with marrying his step daughter, but I do not dismiss his skill as a cinematographer, and I always considered Michael Jackson to be a sad sick person who also happened to be a musical genius, while what’s his name is nothing but a rich perverted creep. Glenn Gould? What about Ayn Rand? Her writings reflected her very disturbed psyche, and perhaps if people knew a little more about her before reading her work, they could at least frame it as writings stemming from a very disturbed mind. Or how my respect for Edward Said grew once I knew more about him.
I have great difficulty with judgemenalism and reading because I sometimes loose or gain respect for the authors once I know about them. Should the work stand on its own? I can easily dismiss the work because of the person, is that fair? Do I falsely claim a connection? I find it hard to read the work of people who write about equality and reflexivity when they cannot seem to practice it. Do these not go hand in hand?
Bref, I think it is important to learn about the people whose work we/I read. I am not promoting essentialism yet I am really not sure if we/I can separate the person from the work, that we/I should, but maybe some of their personal history does determine what they pursue and how they do so. I certainly wonder all the time about where I have come from and the reasons why I pursue the work that I do. I have not yet figured out all the details, but I can certainly see that my past, personal experience and learning trajectory very much influences how I think and how my thinking has evolved overtime. If people know our pasts, will they judge the work from that lens? Will they dismiss what we do if they judge who we are and perhaps falsely associate what they think about the work based on what they can only partially know about the person? With Heidegger, it is not just the person, but also the ideology, and as a philospher, I presume that the ideology and the philosophy are inseparable, yet we do not dismiss the entire German nation for their technology prowess? Nor do we stop using IBM computers or driving BMWs because of their historical roots with the Nazi regime either! Do we stop using electricity because because Edison was a megalomaniac? Or dismiss Turin because he was gay, as the British establishment did at the end of the war? Or should we at least know so that we can position these technologies in a historical context and then consider these when we build new ones? In the case of Turin, does it matter? Should Glenn Gould’s should his music be dismissed because he was autistic and somewhat OCD? When does it matter?
Inspired by: An Ethical Question: Does a Nazi Deserve a Place Among Philosophers?
